There is one way of wearing a bikini that the whole world wants to copy: the Brazilian way. Versiani Swim was built for the women who are the essence of Brazil — self-assured and independent, they claim their moment in the sun and their time for self-care. A native brand of the creator economy — a market expected to triple by 2030 — VS was founded by Gabriela Versiani, whose combined audience tops 10 million. The pieces she designs become objects of desire: they dress the country's biggest influencers and celebrities and define what a Brazilian bikini is — like the Fita, a string-tie model and one of the most viral pieces on the internet, now the brand's signature on the beach.
We own what creates value and desire — brand, product creation and marketing. Production and logistics are outsourced, orchestrated by our own data.
And the leverage is AI: from marketing to finance, proprietary agents and processes make VS the perfect laboratory for the new-economy ecommerce model.
Copying one layer is possible. Copying all four at once is not.
Bikinis account for 62% of revenue, while the Fitness line nearly tripled in one year — diversifying the base. R$ 14.6M in LTM revenue, +30% over the prior period.
The bikini core remains stable and dominant, while Fitness jumped from R$ 1.6M to R$ 4.4M in one year — evidence that the brand extends beyond swimwear.
The owned audience adds up to ~11.2 million followers across founder and brand — and the pieces travel organically on the bodies of the country's biggest celebrities.









| Front | Scale | Return |
|---|---|---|
| Influencer channel (paid media) | R$ 386k LTM | 3.33× |
| Commissioned creator network | dedicated platform | commission per sale |
| Founder event collection · Bridal Edition | Sep-26 | repeat-purchase trigger |
Every order starts with a 74% gross margin and pays back in just over four months. The value lever is repeat purchase — still being built.
| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average order value (AOV) | R$ 349 | R$ 80–140 typical | Above |
| Gross margin (product) | 73.9% | 65–75% | Top of range |
| Contribution margin | 30.6% | 30–45% | In range |
| MER (marketing efficiency) | 7.8× | 2–4× | Above |
| Blended CAC | R$ 67 | — | Low |
| LTV / CAC | 2.66× | > 3× | On track |
| 12m repeat purchase | 21.8% | 25–40% | On track |
| Return rate | 18.8% | 20–35% (swim) | Below |
Returns below benchmark are a positive — swimwear is a highly size-sensitive category. LTV/CAC and repeat purchase are the expansion levers, underpinned by strong margin and MER.
| Channel | Spend | New customers | CAC | ROAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta (FB/IG) | R$ 636,575 | 3,946 | R$ 161 | |
| R$ 132,598 | 2,347 | R$ 57 | ||
| TikTok | R$ 148,578 | 4,228 | R$ 35 | |
| Influencer | R$ 176,759 | 1,699 | R$ 104 | |
| Organic / Direct | — | 7,059 · 29.3% | R$ 0 | |
| Blended total | R$ 1,094,510 | 24,084 | R$ 45 |
Media spend grew 16× in two years — and efficiency held. Blended MER of 7.9×, nearly double the top of the benchmark range. The brand remains the single largest acquisition engine.
| Channel | FY-2 | FY-1 | LTM | ROAS LTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta (FB/IG) | R$ 91k | R$ 671k | R$ 888k | 2.08× |
| Google Search | R$ 10k | R$ 34k | R$ 59k | 18.03× |
| Google Perf Max | R$ 14k | R$ 79k | R$ 147k | 2.82× |
| TikTok | — | — | R$ 149k | 5.63× |
| Influencer | — | R$ 110k | R$ 386k | 3.33× |
| Events | — | — | R$ 68k | — |
| Other | — | R$ 24k | R$ 143k | — |
| Total | R$ 116k | R$ 918k | R$ 1.84M | — |
Google Search delivers 18× ROAS on just 3% of total spend — an underused channel with clear headroom to scale. TikTok went from zero to 5.6× in a single year.
MER (7.9×) runs ahead of attributed ROAS (3.0×) because it captures all revenue — including organic, which media attribution does not pick up. DTC swim benchmark: 2–4×.
| Metric | Value | Read |
|---|---|---|
| % of revenue via email/SMS | 2.1% | upside — underused channel |
| Click rate (email) | 0.5% | engagement to unlock |
| SMS list | 0 | channel fully inactive |
| Cohort | New | M0 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 | M8 | M9 | M10 | M11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug-25 | 1,341 | 100 | 10.2 | 12.5 | 25.6 | 8.4 | 3.5 | 9.1 | 6.8 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 13.9 |
| Sep-25 | 1,343 | 100 | 8.2 | 16.7 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 6.0 | |
| Oct-25 | 1,575 | 100 | 17.4 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 6.3 | ||
| Nov-25 | 7,957 | 100 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 6.9 | |||
| Dec-25 | 3,302 | 100 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 4.5 | ||||
| Jan-26 | 2,140 | 100 | 10.4 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 5.7 | |||||
| Feb-26 | 1,313 | 100 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 2.6 | 7.9 | ||||||
| Mar-26 | 1,145 | 100 | 9.8 | 10.1 | 3.7 | 8.9 | |||||||
| Apr-26 | 2,096 | 100 | 10.3 | 2.7 | 9.3 | ||||||||
| May-26 | 1,234 | 100 | 5.9 | 11.5 | |||||||||
| Jun-26 | 683 | 100 | 18.8 | ||||||||||
| Jul-26 | 5,790 | 100 |
Every unit is marked up 74% over cost and sustains a 69% gross margin, with very little discounting. Domestic production — no international freight, FX or tariff exposure.
Domestic inbound freight is immaterial (<1% of COGS) and import duty is zero — domestic production, with no FX or tariff exposure. Already embedded in the landed cost.
Short lead time (6 weeks) and low MOQ (100 units) — the domestic supply chain delivers replenishment agility that importers do not have. Concentration in validated hero products: 70% of revenue in the top 10.
The accounting firm was replaced and the previous one did not deliver the 2025 close. Tax documents are being consolidated with the new team; COGS, ending inventory and provisions will be released with the closed financial statements — expected by the first week of August.
Lean outsourced fulfillment, 97% of orders shipped on time and chargebacks at 0.44% — half the card network ceiling. The operation scales without losing control.
Customers cover 97% of shipping — the subsidy (R$ 0.45/order) comes only from occasional free shipping promotions. Fulfillment at 2.2% of revenue, with an outsourced domestic operator (CrossDo).
Net returns of only 3.5% — most of it is size exchange, not buyer's remorse. Swimwear is a category naturally sensitive to fit.
Anti-fraud contains the loss: even with fraud attempts, chargebacks stay at 0.44% — half the ceiling. Financial risk is small and controlled.
Customer service volume is the acknowledged bottleneck of the operation. The response is already underway: rollout of Venda.AI, an AI agent that answers instantly and relieves the human queue — with NPS and response time instrumentation to follow.
Two shareholders, 60/40, no prior dilution, no option pool and no convertible debt. A simple, transparent base for a new investor to come in.
| Shareholder | Security | Quotas | % FD |
|---|---|---|---|
RNA Group Ltda CNPJ 65.513.088/0001-90 · managed by Rafael Assis Carvalho |
Quotas | 12 | 60.00% |
Gabriela Versiani Porto Fernandes Ltda CNPJ 36.996.513/0001-41 |
Quotas | 8 | 40.00% |
| Total | 20 | 100.00% |
Cap table with no prior rounds, convertibles or debt — the new investor comes in on a clean base. The exit waterfall will be modeled alongside the round terms.









